Listen free for 30 days

Listen with offer

Sample
  • Fake Science

  • Exposing the Left's Skewed Statistics, Fuzzy Facts, and Dodgy Data
  • By: Austin Ruse
  • Narrated by: Mike Chamberlain
  • Length: 9 hrs and 12 mins
  • 3.4 out of 5 stars (7 ratings)

£0.00 for first 30 days

Thousands of incredible audiobooks and podcasts to take wherever you go.
Immerse yourself in a world of storytelling with the Plus Catalogue - unlimited listening to thousands of select audiobooks, podcasts and Audible Originals.
£7.99/month after 30 days. Renews automatically. See here for eligibility.

Fake Science

By: Austin Ruse
Narrated by: Mike Chamberlain
Try for £0.00

£7.99/month after 30 days. Renews automatically.

Buy Now for £16.99

Buy Now for £16.99

Pay using card ending in
By completing your purchase, you agree to Audible's Conditions of Use and authorise Audible to charge your designated card or any other card on file. Please see our Privacy Notice, Cookies Notice and Interest-based Ads Notice.

Summary

If you listen to any political argument, you're eventually bound to hear something like: "The science is settled on this." Or: "Just look at the statistics!" Or: "There have been studies that say..."

You'd think we were living in the golden age of science and reason. But the truth is far more sinister, says Austin Ruse. We're actually living in the age of the low information voter, easily misled by all-too-convincing false statistics and studies. In Fake Science, Ruse debunks so-called "facts" used to advance political causes one after the other, revealing how poorly they stand up to actual science.

©2017 Mission Audio (P)2017 Mission Audio
activate_samplebutton_t1

Listeners also enjoyed...

Not a Scientist cover art
Bottled Up cover art
The Politically Incorrect Guide to Women, Sex, and Feminism cover art
The Republican Brain cover art
Women After All cover art
You're Teaching My Child What? cover art
Epic Measures cover art
Darwin on Trial cover art
DNA Is Not Destiny cover art
The Culture of Fear cover art
Intellectuals and Race cover art
A Troublesome Inheritance cover art
Pandora’s Lab cover art
Why Have Kids? cover art
Sex at Dawn cover art
Intellectuals and Society cover art

What listeners say about Fake Science

Average customer ratings
Overall
  • 3.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    3
  • 4 Stars
    1
  • 3 Stars
    1
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    2
Performance
  • 3.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    2
  • 4 Stars
    3
  • 3 Stars
    1
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    1
Story
  • 3.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    4
  • 4 Stars
    0
  • 3 Stars
    1
  • 2 Stars
    0
  • 1 Stars
    2

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Sort by:
Filter by:
  • Overall
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    5 out of 5 stars

The looney left

Great book highlighting the looney lefts junk science better known as science to fit their false narrative. It’s merely activism dressed up as science. God help us.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

1 person found this helpful

  • Overall
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Story
    1 out of 5 stars

Fake Science Indeed


If you're expecting a balanced critique of genuinely controversial scientific findings or the politicization of science, reading Austin Ruse's Fake Science: Exposing the Left's Skewed Statistics, Fuzzy Facts, and Dodgy Data is akin to waiting for Godot. This book misses the mark of objective critique, instead offering a series of pointed attacks masked as scientific analysis. Ruse cherry-picks data and misrepresents studies to bolster his argument, which detracts from the valid discussion about biases in scientific research.

The work is less an exploration of science and more a polemic against perceived left-wing conspiracies. Those looking for insightful or nuanced discussion on the actual challenges facing scientific integrity today will find this book disappointingly one-sided. It serves as a reminder of how critical thinking is essential, not just in interpreting scientific data, but also in discerning the quality of its critique.

Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!