Listen free for 30 days
Listen with offer
-
Thirteen Days in September
- Carter, Begin, and Sadat at Camp David
- Narrated by: Mark Bramhall, Lawrence Wright
- Length: 11 hrs and 55 mins
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
£0.00 for first 30 days
Buy Now for £12.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
Summary
ONE OF THE NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REVIEW’ S 10 BEST BOOKS OF THE YEAR
A gripping day-by-day account of the 1978 Camp David conference, when President Jimmy Carter persuaded Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin and Egyptian president Anwar Sadat to sign the first peace treaty in the modern Middle East, one which endures to this day.
With his hallmark insight into the forces at play in the Middle East and his acclaimed journalistic skill, Lawrence Wright takes us through each of the thirteen days of the Camp David conference, illuminating the issues that have made the problems of the region so intractable, as well as exploring the scriptural narratives that continue to frame the conflict. In addition to his in-depth accounts of the lives of the three leaders, Wright draws vivid portraits of other fiery personalities who were present at Camp David–including Moshe Dayan, Osama el-Baz, and Zbigniew Brzezinski–as they work furiously behind the scenes. Wright also explores the significant role played by Rosalynn Carter.
What emerges is a riveting view of the making of this unexpected and so far unprecedented peace. Wright exhibits the full extent of Carter’s persistence in pushing an agreement forward, the extraordinary way in which the participants at the conference—many of them lifelong enemies—attained it, and the profound difficulties inherent in the process and its outcome, not the least of which has been the still unsettled struggle between the Israelis and the Palestinians.
In Thirteen Days in September, Wright gives us a resonant work of history and reportage that provides both a timely revisiting of this important diplomatic triumph and an inside look at how peace is made.
Critic reviews
One of the New York Times Top Ten Best Books of the Year
“A magnificent book [from] one of our finest nonfiction writers. . . . In his minute-by-minute account of the talks Wright intersperses a concise history of Egyptian-Israeli relations dating from the story of Exodus. Even more important is Wright's understanding that Sadat, Begin and Carter were not just political leaders, but exemplars of the Holy Land's three internecine religious traditions." - Joe Klein, New York Times Book Review, front page
“An engrossing chronicle of Carter’s marathon peace negotiations with Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat at Camp David . . . an illuminating view of a vital event that has been all but forgotten—and of a single-minded, even messianic president whose White House years have been denigrated and discredited . . . In examining the three, Wright is both fascinated and fair-minded, seeing men of faith and fortitude, and ultimately of vision, with stark similarities and even starker differences. . . . A wonderful book.”—David M. Shribman, Boston Globe
What listeners say about Thirteen Days in September
Average customer ratingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- North Yorkshire
- 09-05-20
Excellent Audible version
I enjoyed this book a lot - the writing balanced information with a driving narrative and the Audible narrator did a great job.
The 13 days of the Camp David talks are used as the basis for a series of flashbacks that explain the background to the Arab-Israeli conflict: early Israeli immigration, activism in the 1940s, the declaration of the state of Israel in 1948, the conflicts of 1967 and 1973. This was neatly done so that each flashback illuminated some motivation or relation among the key players: Anwar Sadat (Egypt), Menachem Begin (Israel), Moshe Dayan (Israel), and Jimmy Carter (America). Wright managed the pacing really well and it gave the book an un-put-downable quality.
The author is fairly even-handed - though like Carter his desire for peace does tend to see local traditions and experiences more as obstacles than things to be respected. Carter's view of human nature was optimistic: dialogue would erase difference and create a sense of togetherness. But talking can easily exacerbate differences and create quarrels (as the Internet has demonstrated). Wright recounts Carter's success in transcending some examples of overt racial divisions in Sourthern Georgia as a way of explaining (and justifying) his optimism. Wright came across as Carter-like in his wish to jump over the problems and get to peace. He admires the way tricky problems were avoided with verbal ingenuity and shoving the tricky bits into an appendix.
But the middle east was particularly intractable. The conclusion notes Sadat was more flexible about what Egypt needed as he had a troubled relation to his country (and his delegation at Camp David - he kept them in the dark about his negotiations). Sadat wanted to take Egypt in a new direction, rather than clinging to old Egyptian values. Sadat played to Carter's desire for a quick win in the hope of becoming America's preferred partner in the Middle East. It would be possible to present this as cynical but Wright admires diplomacy and warms to Sadat's evident charm.
Menachem Begin is presented as a peace-blocker because of his absolute assertion of Israel's particularity. This seemed to annoy everyone, even his own delegation, who saw benefits in political compromise. Begin's lawyer-trained pedantry is also presented as awkward - a tactic for refusal to engage. Prefering the problem to the solution Begin is not presented as a great diplomat and thus gets rougher treatment.
Begin does come across as ambivalent about peace - to say the least! - but from his perspective the attempt to cobble together a peace to secure political advantage for Carter and Sadat might not have seemed the best way to respect the issues involved or the situation of a country that had repeatedly been threatened with annihilation.
Wright is frustrated that the achievements that were gained at the talks were so readily seen as a sell-out. But the particularities count and a genuine peace has to be have real buy-in rather then feeling like a sell-out. I have held back the 5th star because I think there might have been some discussion of the nature of peace talks and the role of the outside umpire - it seems a particularly important point here. Still, I thoroughly recommend it.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!