Episodes

  • Mr. (Jack) Smith Goes to Washington

    Mr. (Jack) Smith Goes to Washington
    Nov 28 2022
    Explaining the Conflict Issues and the Special Counsel Rules As They Apply in the Justice Department's Investigation of Donald Trump. Stephen Gillers is the Elihu Root Professor of Law Emeritus and Barbara Gillers is an Adjunct Professor of Law, both at New York University School of Law.
    Show More Show Less
    22 mins
  • Documents Inadvertently Sent: Claw It Back. Shaming Lawyers For The Clients They Accept or Reject

    Documents Inadvertently Sent: Claw It Back. Shaming Lawyers For The Clients They Accept or Reject
    Sep 12 2022
    Alex Jones’s law firm reportedly sent opposing counsel years of Jones’s text messages and they were used to cross-examine him. Could the firm have mitigated the harm through what has come to be known as claw back? Are Jones’s lawyers now exposed to discipline or damages? Famed appellate lawyer Paul Clement left Kirkland when the firm decided to stop advocating for Second Amendment rights. Clement had just one a big Second Amendment case in the Supreme Court. On the flip side, lawyers are sometimes shamed because of the clients they do represent. Who’s right here? No one did anything unethical. But can lawyers be criticized for the clients they accept or reject? Stephen Gillers is the Elihu Root Professor of Law and Barbara Gillers is an Adjunct Professor of Law, both at New York University School of Law.
    Show More Show Less
    32 mins
  • Can A Prosectuor Refuse All Abortion Cases? If Indicted, Can Trump Rely on the Advice of Counsel?

    Can A Prosectuor Refuse All Abortion Cases? If Indicted, Can Trump Rely on the Advice of Counsel?
    Aug 8 2022
    About 100 prosecutors nationwide have said they will not prosecute abortion cases. Yet their client is the state and if the state has made abortion a crime, can a local prosecutor ethically refuse to enforce the law? Also, the question has been asked whether, if indicted, Trump could rely on the advice of counsel that his conduct was legal, and thereby create a reasonable doubt about his criminal intent. What is the advice of counsel defense and could it work here? Stephen Gillers is the Elihu Root Professor of Law and Barbara Gillers is an Adjunct Professor of Law, both at New York University School of Law. See show notes and references at https://www.nycbar.org/media-listing/media/detail/can-a-prosecutor-refuse-all-abortion-cases-if-indicted-can-trump-rely-on-the-advice-of-counsel
    Show More Show Less
    23 mins
  • New York’s New Disciplinary Rule against Harassment and Discrimination in Law Practice

    New York’s New Disciplinary Rule against Harassment and Discrimination in Law Practice
    Jul 11 2022
    In June, the New York judiciary adopted one of the most far-reaching disciplinary rules in the nation prohibiting discrimination and harassment, including sexual harassment, in the practice of law. But the journey to that adoption has gone on for nearly 30 years and has divided courts and bar groups nationwide. The Third Circuit is expected to decide a test case on the constitutionality of Pennsylvania's version of the rule later this year. See show notes at https://www.nycbar.org/media-listing/media/detail/new-yorks-new-disciplinary-rule-against-harassment-and-discrimination-in-law-practice
    Show More Show Less
    29 mins
  • Ethics Issues from U.S. v. Sussmann: Right and Wrong Reasons to Indict and What is Truth?

    Ethics Issues from U.S. v. Sussmann: Right and Wrong Reasons to Indict and What is Truth?
    Jun 13 2022
    The recent trial of Michael Sussmann for lying to the FBI about his motives for giving it information that purported to show a link between a Russian bank and Trump interests raises two questions in the world of legal ethics and federal criminal law. The first asks when if ever considerations other than to convict can be a valid basis to indict. The second explores the meaning of truth and falsity in the professional conduct rules and in the statute used to prosecute Sussmann. Stephen Gillers is the Elihu Root Professor of Law and Barbara Gillers is an Adjunct Professor of Law, both at New York University School of Law.
    Show More Show Less
    25 mins
  • What Rules Govern a Law Firm’s Ancillary Business? Law Practice in the Metaverse: New Developments

    What Rules Govern a Law Firm’s Ancillary Business? Law Practice in the Metaverse: New Developments
    May 23 2022
    Clients sometimes need services related to their legal needs but which are not legal services and which nonlawyers may also provide. Lawyers may see this situation as offering an opportunity for them to offer those services including through an entity separate from their law practice. Separately, this podcast reports on further developments facilitating what has come to be known as the practice of law in the Metaverse. Stephen is the Elihu Root Professor of Law and Barbara is an Adjunct Professor of Law, both at New York University School of Law. See this episode's references at https://www.nycbar.org/media-listing/media/detail/what-rules-govern-a-law-firms-ancillary-business-law-practice-in-the-metaverse-new-developments
    Show More Show Less
    33 mins
  • Code of Conduct and Recusal Rules for Federal Judges and Justices and Proposed Legislative Revisions

    Code of Conduct and Recusal Rules for Federal Judges and Justices and Proposed Legislative Revisions
    Apr 25 2022
    The Code of Conduct for U.S. Judges and the federal law governing disqualification of judges and justices have been very much in the news lately, in part (but not only) because of the activism of Virginia Thomas, wife of Justice Clarence Thomas. This podcast explains both the code and the federal law, why it is that Supreme Court Justices alone among judges in the U.S. are not governed by an ethics code, and some proposed legislative solutions. Stephen Gillers is the Elihu Root Professor of Law and Barbara Gillers is an Adjunct Professor of Law, both at New York University School of Law.
    Show More Show Less
    30 mins
  • Recusal Issues at the Jackson Hearings; A Ruling on Eastman's Emails Can Lead To A Trump Indictment

    Recusal Issues at the Jackson Hearings; A Ruling on Eastman's Emails Can Lead To A Trump Indictment
    Mar 21 2022
    The confirmation hearings on Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson's nomination to the Supreme Court are likely to include questions about whether, if confirmed, she would have to recuse herself from the Harvard affirmative action case now before the Court because of her six year membership on the Harvard Board of Overseers. Questions may also arise about her various recusal decisions while on the District Court. A federal judge in California will decide imminently if the January 6 Committee can discover emails of John Eastman, who was instrumental in the effort to prevent President Biden's inauguration. If the court finds for the Committee on the crime fraud exception to the attorney client privilege, its ruling can bring added pressure on the Department of Justice to indict Trump and others. Stephen Gillers is the Elihu Root Professor of Law and Barbara Gillers is an Adjunct Professor of Law, both at New York University School of Law.
    Show More Show Less
    29 mins