Thinking LSAT

By: Nathan Fox and Ben Olson
  • Summary

  • Ben Olson and Nathan Fox started the Thinking LSAT Podcast to become better LSAT teachers and have some fun. Please 1) subscribe, 2) rate and review, and 3) send us questions: help@thinkinglsat.com. Don't pay for law school! Learn more at lsatdemon.com
    Nathan Fox and Ben Olson
    Show More Show Less
activate_samplebutton_t1
Episodes
  • How to Review Your Mistakes (Ep. 470)
    Sep 2 2024

    LSAT growth comes from thoroughly reviewing your mistakes. But what does a thorough review look like? Ben and Nathan describe their approach and explain why they don’t recommend keeping a wrong answer journal. The guys also compare law school to wizard school. They reject an impatient admissions strategy. And they consider potential risks associated with the military’s Funded Legal Education Program.


    Study with our Free Plan

    Download our iOS app

    Watch Episode 470 on YouTube


    1:31 - Confusing Writing - In a new study, cognitive scientists at MIT explain why legalese is so difficult to understand.

    9:13 - Improving in RC - An anonymous listener has been told that they won’t improve much in Reading Comprehension. Ben and Nathan tell Anonymous to ignore the haters.

    14:18 - Review - Nathan and Ben advocate a deep review of every mistake. But keeping a wrong answer journal is likely a waste of time.

    26:42 - Apply Now or Later? - Is it better to apply early with a subpar LSAT or to apply late with a great LSAT? Ben and Nathan ask: Why pick the lesser of two evils when you can avoid the evil entirely?

    34:49 - Comparative RC Passages - The guys outline their approach to comparative passages in Reading Comprehension.

    37:28 - JAG and FLEP - An LSAT Demon student warns listeners about potential risks associated with the military’s Funded Legal Education Program.

    48:28 - Word of the Week - You can mollify your test anxiety by improving at the test.

    Show More Show Less
    53 mins
  • Scholarship Shenanigans (Ep. 469)
    Aug 26 2024

    Ben and Nathan warn listeners about tactics that some law schools use to make mediocre scholarships appear better than they really are. The guys also discuss a new ABA regulation meant to standardize 1L learning outcomes. They double down on their advice to apply broadly. And they model their approach to Logical Reasoning on a Weaken question from PrepTest 123.


    Study with our Free Plan

    Download our iOS app

    Watch Episode 469 on YouTube


    2:27 - Fee Waiver Changes - LSAC now requires students with fee waivers to test twice in LawHub before registering for an official LSAT. Fee waiver recipients must also take the interactive course “How Do I Apply to Law School?”

    7:44 - New Rules for Law Schools - A new ABA regulation aims to make law school courses more uniform and give law students more feedback about their academic progress. Nathan and Ben doubt that the new rules will have their intended effects.

    15:51 - Better School or Better Price? - Is it better to attend a great law school for an OK price or an OK law school for a great price? Ben and Nathan urge listener Daniel to apply broadly and to focus on the LSAT before worrying about his law school decision.

    23:36 - Scholarship Shenanigans - Nathan and Ben shine a light on a shady scholarship practice.

    41:02 - Logical Reasoning: Weaken - The guys tackle a Weaken question from PrepTest 123. Try the question yourself. Then, listen to Ben and Nathan’s explanation.

    56:50 - Word of the Week - Adopt a parsimonious attitude regarding law school.

    Show More Show Less
    1 hr
  • Why Did My Score Drop? (Ep. 468)
    Aug 19 2024

    Nathan and Ben examine the root cause of underperformance on the LSAT: too much concern for the clock and not enough focus on understanding. The guys also poke fun at Nathan’s alma mater, share tips for staying focused on timed sections, and praise a listener’s decision to step away from a T20 law school.


    Study with our Free Plan

    Download our iOS app

    Watch Episode 468 on YouTube


    1:04 - Alumni Donations - The guys laugh at an “exciting opportunity” to donate money to UC Law San Francisco.

    15:31 - Timed Sections - Listener Mike is avoiding timed sections until he improves at the test. Nathan and Ben explain why this approach is misguided—all LSAT students should make timed sections a cornerstone of their study.

    18:43 - Staying Focused - An anonymous listener struggles to stay focused during timed sections. Ben and Nathan instruct Anonymous to zoom in on one question at a time.

    27:44 - Score Drop - Listener Annabelle is flustered by a sudden score drop. Nathan and Ben blame Annabelle’s preoccupation with speed over accuracy.

    33:23 - Why Law School? - The guys counsel a high-earning listener to reconsider their reasons for pursuing law school.

    44:55 - Become a Good Test Taker - Listener Angelina describes herself as “an awful test taker.” Ben and Nathan implore Angelina to improve her self-talk by deciding to become a good test taker.

    49:42 - GPA Addendums - The guys recommend more effective alternatives to writing a GPA addendum.

    59:12 - Dropping Out - Nathan and Ben applaud an anonymous listener’s decision to drop out of law school.

    1:06:19 - Words of the Week - A few students pay for law school. Few feel good about it.

    Show More Show Less
    1 hr and 10 mins

What listeners say about Thinking LSAT

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.