Chris and Kyle continue in their four-part series on the "Four Ps of Disagreement." In this episode, they chat about the obvious: If you can't hear people, you can't disagree with them.

But also, if you have to stand for two hours. If the thermostat is turned up to eighty degrees. If the walls are painted pink. If grizzly bear sightings are a possibility. It's a no-go. Disagreement will not be achieved.

Because place matters. The room has to be conducive to the heat of the argument. It has to be comfortable when things get uncomfortable. It can't be a distraction.

So we have to be wise as serpents in picking where to disagree so that we can be innocent as doves when the stuffing hits the fan.

Join Chris and Kyle as they discuss the most magnificent, incredibly terrible, and just plain stupid places to start, continue, and end an argument.

Disagreers, take note.

Continuing a four-part series on the "Four Ps of Disagreement," this episode tackles the thorny issue of picking the right people to disagree with.

You can't disagree with everyone—you don't have enough time, breath or brain power. But you also shouldn't disagree with everyone. Some aren't worth it.

In fact, the wise and caring thing to do would be to dismiss or ignore them, as mean or unkind this might sound.

Join Chris and Kyle as they discuss the best kind of interlocutor and the worst of the worst, including that nasty Interruptor and that dreadful Devil's Advocate.

This episode begins the last series in Season 1—a four-part series on the "Four Ps of Disagreement."

Why disagree (point)? Who should we disagree with, and who should we avoid like the plague (people)? Where should we disagree (place)? How do we do it (process)?

This is a focused summary and detailed application of all that Chris and Kyle have discussed in Season 1 regarding disagreement. If you are looking for the "Cliff Notes," this is it. Download, study, and get ready for the exam at Christmas dinner.

Politics and religion, here we come.

Join Chris and Kyle as they discuss the purpose of disagreement and why every Christian should conceive of it as a virtue and something good for the Church and the world.