BPMN: The Standard That Delivers?

The “processpitch” podcast episode explores the myth of BPMN as a universal solution for process migration. Patrick Züst, an expert in process modeling, discusses the pros and cons of BPMN with host Mirko, highlighting the challenges of migrating models between different workflow engines through a concrete example.

• BPMN as a Common Language: BPMN’s strength lies in its role as a standard language for process modeling and documentation. It allows both business and IT experts to visualize and understand processes using the same symbols and structures.
• Automation: The Crux: The real challenge, however, lies in automation. BPMN does not specify exactly how processes should be automated. Each workflow engine, such as Camunda or Flowable, uses its own implementations and extensions that go beyond the BPMN standard.
• Migration: Pitfalls and Solutions: Migrating models between different engines is generally possible but can lead to problems due to these engine-specific implementations.
• Flowable Leap: Addressing Compatibility Issues: Flowable Leap is a tool that supports the analysis of models and the identification of potential compatibility issues during migration. It indicates which elements of the model are not compatible with Flowable and what adjustments are necessary.
• Open Standards: The Key to Flexibility: Flowable relies on open standards, avoiding vendor lock-in. Information about models is available in standardized formats like JSON, facilitating migration to other engines. This open approach is positively received by customers and stakeholders.

Conclusion: BPMN is an important tool for process modeling, but automation and migration require a deep understanding of engine-specific implementations. Choosing the right workflow engine and adhering to open standards are crucial to fully leveraging the benefits of BPMN while remaining flexible.

full episode: https://www.youtube.com/live/ppi1boGhCQg?si=LZcFOoaHIsgu5HjI